OOPS. Your Flash player is missing or outdated.Click here to update your player so you can see this content.


Subscribe today
Articling could get the axe: LSUC task force report
Written by Melissa Kluger   
Sunday, 27 January 2008
In an interim report presented last Thursday, the Law Society’s Licensing and Accreditation Task Force proposed that the skills and professional responsibility program be cancelled and suggested some dramatic changes to the articling program. Given the increase in the number of students seeking articles, and the static number of positions available, the Task Force put forward three options:

  • The Status Quo – Continue with articling, but make it clear that the Law Society makes no guarantees that students will find employment.
  • The Alternative – Keep articles but offer another stream for students who don’t find placements.  
  • The End – Abolish articles altogether.

The report blames the projected increase in the number of article-seekers on the rising number of foreign-trained law students, an increase in law school enrollment, and applications by two Ontario universities to open new law schools.

The current system places approximately 1,300 articling students, but the number seeking placement is expected to rise to over 1,700 by 2009. This has given the Law Society serious cause for concern. The Society is inviting written comments until April 3, 2008.

Tell us what you think. Leave a comment or take The Precedent Survey (over there on the sidebar). 

Update: The deadline for written submissions has been extended to May 31. In addition, Convocation voted to add another option for making changes to the articling program. Option #4: Consider any other options. 

Comments (3)add
Associate
Written by JJB , January 28, 2008
A very interesting idea... that will no doubt increase our professional liability premiums, as well as the number of disciplinary issues. I guess nobody was interested in creating a gov't or LSUC fund to pay students to complete their articles at legal aid clinics or with small firms (who could contribute the overhead but otherwise couldn't afford to pay a clerk's salary)?
Three Bad Options
Written by Matthew Sullivan , January 28, 2008
I'm a member of my office's Student Committee and I work a lot with articling students, most of whom impress me tremendously. However, the impression that I am always left with is that they come to us from lawschool lacking some of the most basic skills (especially with respect to practical matters in civil litigation or criminal procedure). I see this as a failure of both the law schools and the Law Society - and none of the options on the table are going to help.
Re: Three Bad Options
Written by Steven , January 29, 2008
True. Law school does not necessarily prepare you for the real world but this is prevalent in all other fields. Even a co-op infused engineering program doesn't prepare you for the real world.

Nonetheless, the point of this poll is to find an answer to the shortage of articles. I don't see how improving law school students' basic skills would ameliorate this situation unless that is the exact reason why firms limit or don't hire articling students.

However, I do agree that the 3 options solve nothing. Personally, I think that we have this situation because of market dynamics. It just can't handle any more lawyers. Removing articles altogether will solve nothing because that'll simply shift the problem. Without articles, there will be more 1st year associates looking for positions and we'll run into the exact same problem. Moreover, in the short term, it'll also create a similar situation to the "double cohort" problem we had when OAC (Grade 13 in Ontario high school) was eliminated.

It's simple. Limit the number of new grads. It's better to be rejected before law school then after law school with thousands of dollars in debt and 3 years of your prime 20s. TWO more law schools? No wonder we're having problems.


Write comment

busy




Digg!Del.icio.us!Facebook!StumbleUpon!
 
< Prev   Next >

| advertisement |
 
www.fmc-law.com/Careers

Connect with us

Facebook
Find us on Facebook

Twitter
Follow us on Twitter

eBrief
Sign up for our email newsletter

Search


Online poll

Should the exposure of sexually explicit photos affect a judge’s standing?
 

Latest comments

The long arm of the U.S. Border Patrol
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/flash/cityroom/Ca...
The $6,000 legal brain gain
Thanks for the mention Todd.
New OBA president set to lead by example
Lee is a quiet but strong and focussed leader. I'm look...
Short Cellar: The paradise of Gin and Tonic
Agreed. The one gin I always have on hand is Hendrick's...
Short Cellar: The paradise of Gin and Tonic
I've become a huge fan of Hendricks gin, which seems to...
Short Cellar: The paradise of Gin and Tonic
How can you have an article about gin and not speak of ...
The Crime Traveller: Israel
Thanks Jerusalemite for being a sharp-eyed reader...you...
The Crime Traveller: Israel
The "gold-domed roof" that is atop the Western Wall is ...
The Crime Traveller: Israel
Thanks CT!
Court Reporter: Thursday, July 29
Especially since the article linked to correctly notes,...

RSS feed

Contact us        Privacy policy       Terms of use